Sustainable People
Planet-wide Overpopulation?
(a) Acres needed to feed a person at US dietary standards = 1.2 (= 0.49 hectares)
(b) # of people = 6.5 billions
(c) Land needed to feed them = (a) * (b) = 31.5 million sq km
(d) Land available = 74 million sq km (from Wikipedia = half of the planet’s “dry” land area)
—-> “Current occupation index” = (c) / (d) = 42.4%
In other words, even if all humans were fed according to US dietary standards, there would be space for 15 billion people.
Even by being very conservative on the figures, it is hard to imagine why the planet would not be able to feed 10 or 12 billion humans.
==============
Interestingly, in an article published in Nature (“The end of world population growth” Nature 412, 543-545, August 2001), Lutz et al. forecast a maximum of 8 billion people, around 2075.
And I haven’t even mentioned likely, incremental agricultural improvements.
Planet-wide Overpopulation, then? Not at all.
And there goes another myth of contemporary catastrophism…
Maurizio - Omnologos 
Throughout time there have been natural catastrophies that level populations. Man has created catastrophies that level populations. If we stop creating people — if population growth were kept to 1 or 2 children per family, what great people in times past would not have existed?
Jeanne Conte
2007/Mar/20 at 04:53:56
[…] situation of overpopulation right now: some back-of-the-envelope calculation seems to suggest full capacity would be around 15 billion people, even allowing for everybody to become a well-fed American. And who can forget that the current […]
Speaking Out About (Over-)Population « Maurizio - Omnologos
2009/Feb/19 at 00:13:58
[…] situation of overpopulation right now: some back-of-the-envelope calculation seems to suggest full capacity would be around 15 billion people, even allowing for everybody to become a well-fed American. And who can forget that the current […]
Speaking Out About (Over-)Population | Omnologos
2012/Mar/22 at 00:17:43