<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misleading Pictures, Wrong Caption&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/</link>
	<description>Where no subject is left unturned</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: omnologos</title>
		<link>http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-8778</link>
		<dc:creator>omnologos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-8778</guid>
		<description>Graham

They went only as far as admitting the caption was wrong (read it &lt;a href=&quot;http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/my-correction-printed-on-the-new-york-review-of-books/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).

I am afraid as long as they&#039;ll stick to the likes of &lt;a href=&quot;http://omnograms.wordpress.com/2007/10/11/the-new-york-review-of-books-bill-mckibben-vs-bjorn-lomborg/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bill McKibben&lt;/a&gt;, truth will always be secondary to &quot;global warming&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham</p>
<p>They went only as far as admitting the caption was wrong (read it <a href="http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/my-correction-printed-on-the-new-york-review-of-books/" rel="nofollow">here</a>).</p>
<p>I am afraid as long as they&#8217;ll stick to the likes of <a href="http://omnograms.wordpress.com/2007/10/11/the-new-york-review-of-books-bill-mckibben-vs-bjorn-lomborg/" rel="nofollow">Bill McKibben</a>, truth will always be secondary to &#8220;global warming&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Eagleton</title>
		<link>http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-8770</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Eagleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-8770</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thanks for your interesting observations.

Did the New York Review of Books publish your letter? What, if any, was the response?

regards

Graham E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks for your interesting observations.</p>
<p>Did the New York Review of Books publish your letter? What, if any, was the response?</p>
<p>regards</p>
<p>Graham E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientific Literature on Patagonian Glaciers &#171; The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE</title>
		<link>http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-8766</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientific Literature on Patagonian Glaciers &#171; The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-8766</guid>
		<description>[...] Patagonian&#160;Glaciers  14 01 2008   And so once more Global Warming has meant the publication of misleading pictures, with a wrong caption&#8230;why oh why does the mere mention of AGW force so many otherwise thoughtful and wise people to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Patagonian&nbsp;Glaciers  14 01 2008   And so once more Global Warming has meant the publication of misleading pictures, with a wrong caption&#8230;why oh why does the mere mention of AGW force so many otherwise thoughtful and wise people to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omnologos</title>
		<link>http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-3511</link>
		<dc:creator>omnologos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-3511</guid>
		<description>Thank you milo. In fact, I have cited 4 papers. Please go read them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you milo. In fact, I have cited 4 papers. Please go read them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milo</title>
		<link>http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>milo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-3509</guid>
		<description>Scientists don&#039;t rely on pictures, they use evidence.  And the evidence is for significant melting.  No amount of cheesy rhetoric by will change that -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3200450.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists don&#8217;t rely on pictures, they use evidence.  And the evidence is for significant melting.  No amount of cheesy rhetoric by will change that -</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3200450.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3200450.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dialogo Sul Cambioclimatismo &#171; Maurizio Morabito</title>
		<link>http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator>Dialogo Sul Cambioclimatismo &#171; Maurizio Morabito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-1588</guid>
		<description>[...] Si dice che si siano sciolti. Io mi sono fatto un giro (virtuale, ahime&#8217;) su quelli della Patagonia, compreso l&#8217;Upsala la cui foto piace tanto a Greenpeace e Al Gore, e (come al solito) ho trovato una situazione molto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Si dice che si siano sciolti. Io mi sono fatto un giro (virtuale, ahime&#8217;) su quelli della Patagonia, compreso l&#8217;Upsala la cui foto piace tanto a Greenpeace e Al Gore, e (come al solito) ho trovato una situazione molto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enzo</title>
		<link>http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Enzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnologos.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/misleading-pictures-wrong-caption/#comment-966</guid>
		<description>Someone please stop the lunatics!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070315/ap_on_hi_te/climate_tech_3
WASHINGTON - Crazy-sounding ideas for saving the planet are getting a serious look from top scientists, a sign of their fears about global warming and the desire for an insurance policy in case things get worse.
ADVERTISEMENT

How crazy?

There&#039;s the man-made &quot;volcano&quot; that shoots gigatons of sulfur high into the air. The space &quot;sun shade&quot; made of trillions of little reflectors between Earth and sun, slightly lowering the planet&#039;s temperature. The forest of ugly artificial &quot;trees&quot; that suck carbon dioxide out of the air. And the &quot;Geritol solution&quot; in which iron dust is dumped into the ocean.

&quot;Of course it&#039;s desperation,&quot; said Stanford University professor Stephen Schneider. &quot;It&#039;s planetary methadone for our planetary heroin addiction. It does come out of the pessimism of any realist that says this planet can&#039;t be trusted to do the right thing.&quot;
[...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone please stop the lunatics!</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070315/ap_on_hi_te/climate_tech_3" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070315/ap_on_hi_te/climate_tech_3</a><br />
WASHINGTON &#8211; Crazy-sounding ideas for saving the planet are getting a serious look from top scientists, a sign of their fears about global warming and the desire for an insurance policy in case things get worse.<br />
ADVERTISEMENT</p>
<p>How crazy?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s the man-made &#8220;volcano&#8221; that shoots gigatons of sulfur high into the air. The space &#8220;sun shade&#8221; made of trillions of little reflectors between Earth and sun, slightly lowering the planet&#8217;s temperature. The forest of ugly artificial &#8220;trees&#8221; that suck carbon dioxide out of the air. And the &#8220;Geritol solution&#8221; in which iron dust is dumped into the ocean.</p>
<p>&#8220;Of course it&#8217;s desperation,&#8221; said Stanford University professor Stephen Schneider. &#8220;It&#8217;s planetary methadone for our planetary heroin addiction. It does come out of the pessimism of any realist that says this planet can&#8217;t be trusted to do the right thing.&#8221;<br />
[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
